---

Ayurvedic woes raise new questions about drug agency oversight


Ayurvedic woes raise new questions about drug agency oversight -- Posted by danger@alert.com on 10-03-04 13:27



Heavy metals in traditional Indian remedies.
Ernst E.
Department of Complementary Medicine, School of Postgraduate
Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, UK.
The growing popularity of traditional Indian remedies
necessitates a critical evaluation of risks associated with
their use. This systematic review aims at summarising all
available data relating to the heavy metal content in such
remedies. Computerised literature searches were carried out to
identify all articles with original data on this subject.
Fifteen case reports and six case series were found. Their
collective results suggest that heavy metals, particularly
lead, have been a regular constituent of traditional Indian
remedies. This has repeatedly caused serious harm to patients
taking such remedies. The incidence of heavy metal
contamination is not known, but one study shows that 64% of
samples collected in India contained significant amounts of
lead (64% mercury, 41% arsenic and 9% cadmium). These findings
should alert us to the possibility of heavy metal content in
traditional Indian remedies and motivate us to consider means
of protecting consumers from such risks.


Re: Ayurvedic woes raise new questions about drug agency oversight -- Posted by Balwant Dixit on 10-03-04 19:08


Most of the Ayurvedic medicines are prepared by the methods that
were established hundreds of years ago. The same methods are even used
today. These methods have poor quality control, and those who
manufacture these medications are not using tests that can easily detect
presence of heavy metals and other toxic substances. It would be
appropriate for the Western countries to ban the importation of these
"so called medications", most of which have never been tested clinically
in statistically validated human patient trials for their
effectiveness. ......Balwant N. Dixit, Professor of Pharmacology,
University of Pittsburgh


Re: Ayurvedic woes raise new questions about drug agency oversight -- Posted by pund kamath on 10-05-04 07:31


Balwant Dixit wrote in message
...
It would be appropriate for the Western countries to ban the
importation of these
> "so called medications", most of which have never been tested clinically
> in statistically validated human patient trials for their
> effectiveness. ......Balwant N. Dixit, Professor of Pharmacology,
> University of Pittsburgh..
I wholeheartedly agree with you. Since powerful lobbies in USA
succeeded in putting herbal medicines under the juridiction of food
category and not under FDA, anybody can label anything on earth and
sell as herbal medication. This all happened under great leader Ronald
Reagan.
Unfortunately adulteration, absence of Quality control happens even in
Canada in basement-laboratories. Often these 'drugs' have absolutely
nothing in them except misleading claims. So it is good idea to ban
them or bring them under some sort of FDA agency.

One more question for you here.
If you are really the professor of Pharmacology,University of
Pittsburgh where and why do you get the time to read all the crap and
rubbish that is posted in these Soc.Indian.culture Ng?. Is it not a
waste your time?


Re: Ayurvedic woes raise new questions about drug agency oversight -- Posted by bdixit on 10-05-04 10:24


I am a professor of pharmacology for real. I have been at the
University of Pittsburgh for more than 40 yr. teaching pharmacology and
other related areas. I have interest in various medicinal systems such
as Ayurveda, Chinese medicine, Egyptian medicine, Medieval Humoral
system of medicine etc. We had a fairly large research program one time
in which many plant based medicines from various areas of the world were
investigated from chemical and pharmacological points of views. That
research is no longer active for various reasons. So I keep up with the
literature on this topic as well as on other topics of interest in
pharmacology. I am particularly concerned with the introduction of
several Ayurvedic medicines as "nutritional supplements" into American
market by those who want to cash in on outlandish claims hope that
answers your question. ......Balwant Dixit


Re: Ayurvedic woes raise new questions about drug agency oversight -- Posted by Harvey R. Stone on 10-05-04 15:56


Thank you for your input and effort to keep people informed about what is
taking place.
Harv
"bdixit" wrote in message
news:4162D8B9.2272FA3E@pitt.edu...
> I am a professor of pharmacology for real. I have been at the
> University of Pittsburgh for more than 40 yr. teaching pharmacology and
> other related areas. I have interest in various medicinal systems such
> as Ayurveda, Chinese medicine, Egyptian medicine, Medieval Humoral
> system of medicine etc. We had a fairly large research program one time
> in which many plant based medicines from various areas of the world were
> investigated from chemical and pharmacological points of views. That
> research is no longer active for various reasons. So I keep up with the
> literature on this topic as well as on other topics of interest in
> pharmacology. I am particularly concerned with the introduction of
> several Ayurvedic medicines as "nutritional supplements" into American
> market by those who want to cash in on outlandish claims hope that
> answers your question. ......Balwant Dixit
>



Re: Vioxx woes raise new questions about drug agency oversight -- Posted by Dr. Jai Maharaj on 10-06-04 02:19


In article ,
"Harvey R. Stone" posted:
> Thank you for your input and effort to keep people informed about what is
> taking place.
> Harv

Forwarded message from "Michael Givel"

[ Subject: Vioxx woes raise new questions about drug agency oversight
[ From: "Michael Givel"
[ Date: 3 Oct 2004 10:36:11 -0500

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2004/10/02/national1257EDT0506.DTL

Vioxx woes raise new questions about drug agency oversight

DIEDTRA HENDERSON, AP Science Writer

Saturday, October 2, 2004

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

(10-02) 09:57 PDT WASHINGTON (AP) --

Americans should feel reasonably safe taking government-approved
prescription drugs -- with a few caveats -- even after a popular arthritis
medication was pulled from the market, medical experts say.

Vioxx was the first prescription drug since 2001 to be taken off the market
for safety reasons. Its maker, Merck & Co., cited an increased risk of heart
attack and stroke in people who used the medication.

The withdrawal on Thursday came just weeks after the company defended the
safety of the drug, which accounted for $2.5 billion in worldwide sales in
2003, and the Food and Drug Administration approved the use of Vioxx in
children as young as 2 years old.

The problems with Vioxx raise questions about the agency's safety review
process and the length of time it took Merck to pull the drug, observers
say.

"No drug is fully safe," said Crystal Rice, an FDA spokeswoman. "Our job is
to appropriately balance our decisions, based on the risk-benefit profile
for a drug and the societal need and desire for new drugs," Rice said in an
e-mail. "We believe that our actions regarding Vioxx were appropriate and
consistent with our public health mission."

The FDA has come under intense pressure from the industry and elsewhere to
approve drugs more quickly, despite clinical trials that some say enroll too
few patients and for too short a time for worrisome side effects to surface.

Research from Harvard, Vanderbilt University and Merck's own clinical trial
long ago uncovered concerns about an increased risk of heart attacks and
high blood pressure linked to Vioxx, said Dr. Jerry Avorn, who pointed to
the issue in his book, "Powerful Medicines: The Benefits, Risks and Costs of
Prescription Drugs."

"Why does it take this long for them to acknowledge the risk?" he asked. "I
fear that FDA has gotten a little bit too cowed by industry demands to
function as a good regulator," said Avorn, an associate professor of
medicine at Harvard Medical School who is affiliated with Brigham and
Women's Hospital in Boston.

An agency spokeswoman, Kathleen K. Quinn, said the FDA gets "pressure from
all sides -- allegations that we're too fast, too slow. We make decisions on
the basis of the science. We weigh the benefits against the risks, ... and
we make the tough calls."

Because of inherent limitations in clinical trials, problems can lie hidden
until drugs go into wider used.

"More than half of all drugs introduced have a new side effect ... after
approval with the current system. I find that disturbing," said Curt
Furberg, a public health sciences professor at Wake Forest University School
of Medicine. For three decades, Furberg has conducted research on how
clinical trials are designed.

Dr. Wayne A. Ray, a Vanderbilt professor of preventive medicine, said the
FDA has a reason to make judgment calls on less than perfect clinical trial
data.

"The FDA is not going to hold up a medication for a generation to make sure
it's safe. And similarly, they're not going to require you to study half a
million people," Ray said.

Still, Ray acknowledged that after drugs are approved, data gaps loom
larger.

Take a drug such as the widely used antibiotic erythromycin. When the
antibiotic is used in concert with newer drugs, the risk of cardiac death is
five times higher, according to a study that Ray conducted. The findings
were published in early September in the New England Journal of Medicine.

An FDA spokesman said erythromycin labels already note that risk. Still, the
agency is reviewing the study to see if additional label changes are
warranted.

Ray said the single study points to a larger problem.

"There is no provision for systematically assessing and reviewing the safety
of the many, many medications that are out there," Ray said. "And the
patients are the ones who are going to suffer."

The vast majority of companies do not follow through on promises to conduct
those reviews, the FDA says. The FDA received 2,400 agreements to conduct
post-marketing studies on drugs. Only 882 such studies were completed,
according to an FDA analysis from Feb. 8, 2002, the most recent data
available.

The FDA could take a simple step that would improve clinical trial quality
before it approved drugs, observers say. Drug companies with products
comparable to Vioxx could be required to conduct longer clinical trials.

"If you're the FDA, you'll say `OK, all bets are off. We're going to make
you do studies lasting 18 months,"' said Dr. Sidney Wolfe, director of
Public Citizen.

At the time of approval, the FDA had data from clinical trials on Vioxx that
lasted for 12 months. The increased risk of heart attack and stroke that
prompted Merck to pull Vioxx did not begin to appear until older patients
had taken took the drug for 18 months.

In a telephone briefing with reporters, Dr. Steven Galson, the agency's
acting director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said the FDA
will move in that direction for comparable drugs on the market and for such
drugs that might be approved in the future.

"It's too early for me to say, right now, how we're going to change our
requirements," Galson said. "But, obviously, we're going to be more
interested in long-term data."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

On the Net:

Food and Drug Administration: www.fda.gov

[demime 0.98e removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of clear.gif]

[demime 0.98e removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of logo_ap.gif]

End of forwarded message from "Michael Givel"

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:

"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.

1 2 Next »

Related Discussion:

Imflamation and arthritis (4 posts)
by awthrawthr - Last post on: 04-22-04 09:54
Did anyone see the cover story in Newsweek/Time regarding the imflammation connection to so many different conditions, including arthritis? ... (Read More)

Your Healthy Heart (1 posts)
by Gumbo - Last post on: 11-04-04 17:26
Your Healthy Heart Salt - The Taste Trap By Sheldon H. Gottlieb, MD, FACC "Tasteless. This food is tasteless," announced Zadie, my wife's grandfather, after sampling his carefully prepared no-salt meal. Back when he was 72, Zadie had had a heart attack. Afterwards, his doctor issued the or... (Read More)

Lets let the experts in here decide (37 posts)
by Cheeky Bastard - Last post on: 07-23-05 19:06
I seem to be getting some conflicting reports about my health so I will hold back on my personal observations and let the real experts (People who are diabetic) comment. I will add that exercise is not too much of an option right now because I have Fibromyalgia and I am under no pain manage... (Read More)

Live a better and sefer life!! (1 posts)
by Michael Allen - Last post on: 12-04-04 15:06
This Vitamin nutritionally supports people with STRESS, WEIGHT-LOSS, ANTI-AGING, ACNE-SKIN, BLOOD-SUGAR-DIABETES, BONES, SLEEP,CANCER, STROKE, IMMUNE-SYSTEM, KIDNEY-LIVER, EYE-SIGHT and much more. --- MAF Anti-Spam ID: 20041007193504F7t8RxC7 ... (Read More)



Top Discussions From Our Archives

New All Natural Vitamin

Discharge from military for type 1

Trip to Disney

Lower back pain / sciatica / bloodletting

Coping with the holidays: 12 tips to manage stress and the blues



Other Discussion Categories

Diabetes Symptoms
Health Care Policy
Health Care Providers HMO



Click here



 
 
 
  
 

Home | Discussion Archives |