---

Confused, looking for answers


Confused, looking for answers -- Posted by Susan Kennedy on 01-12-05 17:47


Diabetes runs in my family. As a result, I get tested every year or two.

Last year, I had my gallbladder out. The day before, in doing tests that
had to be done before the operation, they included a blood sugar test. It
was evidently high enough for me to be considered diabetic, but the average
blood sugar was not, and nothing was said to me. This was in May.

In June I was laid off.

In September or October, I had another test run, being unaware that one had
been done in May. At that time, I had just started a new diet and exercise
regimen. The test came back with an average blood sugar that rated me as
pre-diabetic. The blood sugar for that day, however, was in the diabetic
range. At that time, I had been unemployed for over 3 months. I was told
by the PA who ordered the test that I was pre-diabetic. Later, the
diagnoses was changed to diabetic, I suspect at the instigation of the woman
who runs the local diabetic education classes and who I also suspect
receives money for her program based on the number of diagnosed cases in the
area (I know her money comes from grants).

It is my understanding that stress raises your blood sugar, and I am
confused, and have been unable to get satisfactory answers from my health
care providers as to why the blood sugar for those two (high stress) days is
more important than the average blood sugar that gave a different result.
Even more confusing is that every time I have actually *tested* my blood
sugar, it has come out in the normal range, probably the result of the
exercise regimen I have managed to stick to, even when I went off the diet.
At first, I attributed the normal blood sugar readings to the pills they
gave me, but when I ran out of pills, I couldn't afford to get more (my
income has been cut in half), and yet the readings continued to come out in
the normal range.

Should I be getting a second opinion here? One of the reasons I've given up
on the diet is that the whole thing has become discouraging, especially not
being able to get an understandable answer to my questions.



Re: Confused, looking for answers -- Posted by no@no.com on 01-13-05 03:54


Hello, Susan.

First, alt.health.diabetes is not a very active group. There's more traffic
at alt.support.diabetes or alt.support.diabetes.uk. I'll crosspost my answer
over there.


On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:47:08 -0600, Susan Kennedy wrote:

> Diabetes runs in my family. As a result, I get tested every year or two.
>
> Last year, I had my gallbladder out. The day before, in doing tests that
> had to be done before the operation, they included a blood sugar test. It
> was evidently high enough for me to be considered diabetic, but the
average
> blood sugar was not, and nothing was said to me. This was in May.


By 'average', do you mean A1c or HBa1c (same thing)?

It's possible for the A1c to be normal but still have diabetes. The highs
and lows might cancel each other out in the average, but they would still be
dangerous. It's like a high desert country where it gets too hot in day and
too cold at night, but the average could be 70F. :)



> In June I was laid off.
>
> In September or October, I had another test run, being unaware that one
had
> been done in May. At that time, I had just started a new diet and
exercise
> regimen. The test came back with an average blood sugar that rated me as
> pre-diabetic. The blood sugar for that day, however, was in the diabetic
> range.

Definitions and standards of 'diabetic' vs 'pre-diabetic' vary a lot.


> At that time, I had been unemployed for over 3 months. I was told
> by the PA who ordered the test that I was pre-diabetic. Later, the
> diagnoses was changed to diabetic, I suspect at the instigation of the
woman
> who runs the local diabetic education classes and who I also suspect
> receives money for her program based on the number of diagnosed cases in
the
> area (I know her money comes from grants).


They might have been using different definitions/standards. People on Usenet
may have a different standard yet. :)


>
> It is my understanding that stress raises your blood sugar, and I am
> confused, and have been unable to get satisfactory answers from my health
> care providers as to why the blood sugar for those two (high stress) days
is
> more important than the average blood sugar that gave a different result.
> Even more confusing is that every time I have actually *tested* my blood
> sugar,

Do you have your own meter? How much does it cost you for test strips? Some
people test quite a lot to figure out what's going on.


> it has come out in the normal range, probably the result of the
> exercise regimen I have managed to stick to, even when I went off the
diet.
> At first, I attributed the normal blood sugar readings to the pills they
> gave me, but when I ran out of pills, I couldn't afford to get more (my
> income has been cut in half), and yet the readings continued to come out
in
> the normal range.
>
> Should I be getting a second opinion here? One of the reasons I've given
up
> on the diet is that the whole thing has become discouraging, especially
not
> being able to get an understandable answer to my questions.


The more you test on your own, and keep a food journal, the more info you'd
have for this team or for another doctor.

I'm sure others will have better answers than mine.


Good luck,
Skinny


Re: Confused, looking for answers -- Posted by None Given on 01-13-05 09:46


"Susan Kennedy" wrote in message
news:34m2apF4c3ehqU1@individual.net...
>> At first, I attributed the normal blood sugar readings to the pills they
> gave me, but when I ran out of pills, I couldn't afford to get more (my
> income has been cut in half), and yet the readings continued to come out
in
> the normal range.
>
> Should I be getting a second opinion here? One of the reasons I've given

up
> on the diet is that the whole thing has become discouraging, especially
not
> being able to get an understandable answer to my questions.


Doctor shopping may find you one who uses different criteria for a
diagnosis, but a second opinion won't change your numbers. Diabetes is
progressive, it keeps getting worse. What we want to do is slow down how
fast it does that. Any doctor shopping you do should be to find a better
standard of care, but you have to be the one who sets the standard.
Do check out these links.
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm
news:alt.support.diabetes (your killfile is your friend, lots of gems
buried in tons of crap)




Re: Confused, looking for answers -- Posted by Deb on 01-13-05 12:48


Could you give us some actual numbers? Its impossible to know whether you
are being told you are diabetic falsely without knowing what all the tests
results were.



"Susan Kennedy" wrote in message
news:34m2apF4c3ehqU1@individual.net...
> Diabetes runs in my family. As a result, I get tested every year or two.
>
> Last year, I had my gallbladder out. The day before, in doing tests that

> had to be done before the operation, they included a blood sugar test. It
> was evidently high enough for me to be considered diabetic, but the
average
> blood sugar was not, and nothing was said to me. This was in May.
>
> In June I was laid off.

>
> In September or October, I had another test run, being unaware that one

had
> been done in May. At that time, I had just started a new diet and
exercise
> regimen. The test came back with an average blood sugar that rated me as
> pre-diabetic. The blood sugar for that day, however, was in the diabetic
> range. At that time, I had been unemployed for over 3 months. I was told
> by the PA who ordered the test that I was pre-diabetic. Later, the
> diagnoses was changed to diabetic, I suspect at the instigation of the
woman
> who runs the local diabetic education classes and who I also suspect
> receives money for her program based on the number of diagnosed cases in
the
> area (I know her money comes from grants).
>
> It is my understanding that stress raises your blood sugar, and I am

> confused, and have been unable to get satisfactory answers from my health
> care providers as to why the blood sugar for those two (high stress) days
is
> more important than the average blood sugar that gave a different result.
> Even more confusing is that every time I have actually *tested* my blood
> sugar, it has come out in the normal range, probably the result of the
> exercise regimen I have managed to stick to, even when I went off the
diet.
> At first, I attributed the normal blood sugar readings to the pills they
> gave me, but when I ran out of pills, I couldn't afford to get more (my
> income has been cut in half), and yet the readings continued to come out
in
> the normal range.
>
> Should I be getting a second opinion here? One of the reasons I've given

up
> on the diet is that the whole thing has become discouraging, especially
not
> being able to get an understandable answer to my questions.
>
>




Re: Confused, looking for answers -- Posted by MaĒk on 01-13-05 22:43


On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:47:08 -0600, "Susan Kennedy"
Huffed and Puffed the following into the
madness of usenet:

>Diabetes runs in my family. As a result, I get tested every year or two.
>
>Last year, I had my gallbladder out. The day before, in doing tests that

>had to be done before the operation, they included a blood sugar test. It
>was evidently high enough for me to be considered diabetic, but the average
>blood sugar was not, and nothing was said to me. This was in May.
>
>In June I was laid off.

>
>In September or October, I had another test run, being unaware that one had

>been done in May. At that time, I had just started a new diet and exercise
>regimen. The test came back with an average blood sugar that rated me as
>pre-diabetic. The blood sugar for that day, however, was in the diabetic
>range. At that time, I had been unemployed for over 3 months. I was told
>by the PA who ordered the test that I was pre-diabetic. Later, the
>diagnoses was changed to diabetic, I suspect at the instigation of the woman
>who runs the local diabetic education classes and who I also suspect
>receives money for her program based on the number of diagnosed cases in the
>area (I know her money comes from grants).

if a doctor based his diagnosis on that criteria he should be fired.

>
>It is my understanding that stress raises your blood sugar, and I am

>confused, and have been unable to get satisfactory answers from my health
>care providers as to why the blood sugar for those two (high stress) days is
>more important than the average blood sugar that gave a different result.
>Even more confusing is that every time I have actually *tested* my blood
>sugar, it has come out in the normal range, probably the result of the
>exercise regimen I have managed to stick to, even when I went off the diet.
>At first, I attributed the normal blood sugar readings to the pills they
>gave me, but when I ran out of pills, I couldn't afford to get more (my
>income has been cut in half), and yet the readings continued to come out in
>the normal range.
>
>Should I be getting a second opinion here? One of the reasons I've given up

>on the diet is that the whole thing has become discouraging, especially not
>being able to get an understandable answer to my questions.
>


what were the actual test readings/numbers and exactly what tests were
they?

Māck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org



"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

(o o)
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."


Re: Confused, looking for answers -- Posted by gwatersusa@optonline.net on 03-09-05 08:45


go here www.mendosa.com

I just bought a book by Gretchen Becker called type 2 Diabetes, it will
tell you everything.

It really is a tough to be a diabetic.

Good Luck Greg

I have had it for five years or more and just finding out about it.




On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:47:08 -0600, Susan Kennedy wrote:

> Diabetes runs in my family. As a result, I get tested every year or two.
>
> Last year, I had my gallbladder out. The day before, in doing tests that
> had to be done before the operation, they included a blood sugar test. It
> was evidently high enough for me to be considered diabetic, but the
> average blood sugar was not, and nothing was said to me. This was in May.
>
> In June I was laid off.
>
> In September or October, I had another test run, being unaware that one
> had been done in May. At that time, I had just started a new diet and
> exercise regimen. The test came back with an average blood sugar that
> rated me as pre-diabetic. The blood sugar for that day, however, was in
> the diabetic range. At that time, I had been unemployed for over 3
> months. I was told by the PA who ordered the test that I was
> pre-diabetic. Later, the diagnoses was changed to diabetic, I suspect at
> the instigation of the woman who runs the local diabetic education classes
> and who I also suspect receives money for her program based on the number
> of diagnosed cases in the area (I know her money comes from grants).
>
> It is my understanding that stress raises your blood sugar, and I am
> confused, and have been unable to get satisfactory answers from my health
> care providers as to why the blood sugar for those two (high stress) days
> is more important than the average blood sugar that gave a different
> result. Even more confusing is that every time I have actually *tested* my
> blood sugar, it has come out in the normal range, probably the result of
> the exercise regimen I have managed to stick to, even when I went off the
> diet. At first, I attributed the normal blood sugar readings to the pills
> they gave me, but when I ran out of pills, I couldn't afford to get more
> (my income has been cut in half), and yet the readings continued to come
> out in the normal range.
>
> Should I be getting a second opinion here? One of the reasons I've given
> up on the diet is that the whole thing has become discouraging, especially
> not being able to get an understandable answer to my questions.

1 2 Next »

Related Discussion:

()()()()()()()FREE PHONESEX -- girls call this service free 50cents for guys 4593 (1 posts)
by ileorw@phonesex.com - Last post on: 08-17-03 13:21
Live Phone Dating - Call Now: 1-800-418-CHIC gljucywjlblpbhsyxnwbwxxlnrxcepxcfguftdnwljncjfm ... (Read More)

Do you qualify for Free Diabetic Supplies? (2 posts)
by Joe - Last post on: 05-20-05 05:11
http://www.findcoolstuffhere.com/diabetic.php ... (Read More)

Low Carb High Fat Dieting - Yahoo Group (2 posts)
by Dave - Last post on: 06-29-04 10:36
New group on Yahoo. Come join in. http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/LowCarbHighFat/ low carb is great for type 2 ... (Read More)

Prescription Drug Costs Cut Dramatically (1 posts)
by Samar - Last post on: 01-04-04 18:55
--------------B4E2795EC3765FA925D55F8D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Prescription drug costs can be overwhelming, but there is a health coverage option that can help cut those costs dramatically. ... (Read More)



Top Discussions From Our Archives

Meditation 2005 Online Class 1 Classes commence 1 January 2005 =============== yrawGMMB

First Vioxx, now Bextra?

Sweetener Information

Bunion Surgery and arthritis



Other Discussion Categories

Diabetes Symptoms
Health Care Policy
Health Care Providers HMO
Arthritis Symptoms


Warning: fopen(http://www.tentsamerica.info/index.xml): failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found in /home/xtrack/domains/xtrack.net/public_html/xml/XmlParser.class.php on line 127
Oops!!! Unexpected Error While Reading the Feed



Click here



 
 
 
  
 

Home | Discussion Archives |