| | |
---
Glucose Meter Problems Reported to FDA Glucose Meter Problems Reported to FDA -- Posted by Gumbo on 03-06-05 06:59
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_00A2_01C52233.4192E6B0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Glucose Meter Problems Reported to FDA=20
Reports from BG monitor users to FDA reveal the most common problems =
with blood glucose monitors.
Glucose meters have unquestionable clinical utility, particularly in =
management of diabetes mellitus. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) =
surveillance activities include monitoring adverse event reports from =
healthcare professionals, manufacturers, and lay users.
To gain insight into problems reported to FDA on glucose meters, the FDA =
analyzed reports received over a 3-year period (2000-2002) from all =
sources (mandatory and voluntary) and focused on reports from users.
The results showed that the vast majority of in vitro diagnostic device =
(IVD) reports (84%, n =3D 18,959) were on glucose meters, with 333 =
glucose meter reports from users. Among the user reports, the most =
common problems were false high or low values and erratic values. Unique =
issues reported included purchase of incorrect glucose meter strips, =
calibration problems, and misunderstanding how FDA regulates glucose =
device performance.
THE U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA) receives more adverse event =
reports on glucose meters than on any other in vitro diagnostic device =
(IVD). They studied adverse event reports on glucose meters received =
during the 3-year period from 2000 through 2002, giving special =
attention to voluntary reports submitted by device users through FDA's =
Med.-Watch program (see description below). Most adverse event reports =
come to FDA from manufacturers as mandatory reports. FDA requires =
manufacturers to investigate device problems, to take any needed =
corrective actions, and to report their actions and conclusions to FDA. =
FDA analyses often focus on mandatory reports because they include the =
results of manufacturer investigations.=20
Given that approximately 4.2 million self-monitoring glucose test strips =
are used each day in the United States, users reported very few problems =
directly to FDA.
Most (53%) of the voluntary reports on glucose meters came from =
patients. By comparison, only 17% of reports on all IVD products came =
from patients. Others who submitted re-ports on glucose meters included =
patient family members, pharmacists, other healthcare providers, and (in =
one case) an attorney.
Among the voluntary reports, the most commonly reported glucose meter =
problems were false high values (n =3D 17), false low values (n =3D 15), =
and erratic values (n =3D 11). In addition, reports identified a number =
of unique issues:=20
*Six users reported they had inadvertently purchased meter strips =
labeled not for use in the United States. These strips often exhibited =
differences in calibration, labeling, and expiration dating. Users =
should be advised to check their glucose strip labeling and promptly =
return any inappropriately imported strips.
. Two users did not know the two ways to calibrate glucose meters to =
measure finger stick glucose are to match finger stick glucose results =
with: (1) glucose results in whole blood and (2) glucose results in =
plasma. Both ways produce clinically valuable results; however, the =
results differ in that plasma results are 10-12% higher than whole blood =
results. Users should carefully read all labels and instructions for use =
for their meter and their glucose test strips to determine how their =
meter is calibrated, and to understand how calibration affects their =
treatment decisions.
. Some users expressed surprise that FDA does not have performance =
requirements for glucose meters. The Medical Device Amendments of 1976 =
require new tests to be as accurate as old tests. The Diabetes Control =
and Complications Trial unequivocally indicated home glucose =
measurements are valuable.
* Data suggest the current generation of glucose meters performs better =
than those used in that study. An absolute measure of accuracy for =
glucose has not been defined. Because no universally recognized glucose =
reference method exists, it is difficult to compare the performance of =
glucose meters.=20
Recently, FDA worked with scientists across the globe to develop a new =
standard for glucose meters that sets a target of 20% total error and =
requires labeling to help communicate meter performance.
. Some reports indicated users did not know how to check glucose meter =
performance. Users should know they can compare their meter results with =
the result of a laboratory test ordered by their physician.
Additionally, users should know that manufacturers of glucose meters =
will provide them:
. technical support
. quality control materials they can use to check or monitor meter =
performance
. replacement strips, meters, and calibration check materials
MedWatch is the FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting =
Program, is FDA's established mechanism for healthcare professionals and =
others to voluntarily report problems suspected to be associated with =
drugs and medical devices they prescribe, dispense, or use. MedWatch =
also provides information about safety issues involving medical =
products, including prescription and over-the-counter drugs, biologics, =
medical and radiation-emitting devices, and special nutritional =
products. Medical product safety alerts, recalls, withdrawals, and =
important labeling changes are disseminated to the medical community and =
the general public on the MedWatch web site at: =
http://w-vvw.fda.gov/medwatch/index.htiid.
FDA encourages those who use glucose meters to report problems to =
MedWatch. Reports can be submitted as follows:
Fax to 1-800-FDA-0178, Phone to 1-800-FDA-1088, submit online at: =
www.fda.gov/medwatch or mail to MedWatch, FDA, HF-2, 5600 Fishers Lane, =
Rockville, MD 20852-9787
REFERENCES
1. The U.S. blood glucose strips market: diabetes glucose =
self-monitoring test strips market: annual utilization of test strips =
2002. Dialog File Number 767. Accession Number 1022839. London: Frost =
and Sullivan. Available from: http://www.dialogselect.com/business/ =
cgi/present. Accessed 09 June 2003.
2. Weitgasser R, Gappmayer B, Pichler M: Newer portable glucose =
meters-analytical improvement compared with previous generation devices? =
Clin Chem 1999;45:1821-1825.
3. International Standardization Organization: ISO/FDIS 15197:2003(E). =
Requirements for In Vitro Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for =
Self-Testing in Managing Diabetes Mellitus. U.S. Technical Advisory =
Group for ISO/TC212. Administered by NCCLS. Wayne, PA: Global Consensus
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
------=_NextPart_000_00A2_01C52233.4192E6B0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
size=3D4>
face=3Dverdana,arial color=3D#c00000 size=3D5> Glucose Meter Problems =
Reported to=20
FDA
color=3D#000000=20
size=3D2>Reports from BG monitor users to FDA reveal the most common =
problems with=20
blood glucose monitors.
color=3D#000000=20
size=3D2>Glucose meters have unquestionable clinical utility, =
particularly in=20
management of diabetes mellitus. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) =
surveillance activities include monitoring adverse event reports from =
healthcare=20
professionals, manufacturers, and lay users.
color=3D#000000=20
size=3D2>To gain insight into problems reported to FDA on glucose =
meters, the FDA=20
analyzed reports received over a 3-year period (2000=962002) from all =
sources=20
(mandatory and voluntary) and focused on reports from =
users.
color=3D#000000=20
size=3D2>The results showed that the vast majority of in vitro =
diagnostic device=20
(IVD) reports (84%, n =3D 18,959) were on glucose meters, with 333 =
glucose meter=20
reports from users. Among the user reports, the most common problems =
were false=20
high or low values and erratic values. Unique issues reported included =
purchase=20
of incorrect glucose meter strips, calibration problems, and =
misunderstanding=20
how FDA regulates glucose device performance.
color=3D#000000=20
size=3D2>THE U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA) receives more =
adverse event=20
reports on glucose meters than on any other in vitro diagnostic device =
(IVD).=20
They studied adverse event reports on glucose meters received during the =
3-year=20
period from 2000 through 2002, giving special attention to voluntary =
reports=20
submitted by device users through FDA's Med.-Watch program (see =
description=20
below). Most adverse event reports come to FDA from manufacturers as =
mandatory=20
reports. FDA requires manufacturers to investigate device problems, to =
take any=20
needed corrective actions, and to report their actions and conclusions =
to FDA.=20
FDA analyses often focus on mandatory reports because they include the =
results=20
of manufacturer investigations.
color=3D#000000=20
size=3D2>Given that approximately 4.2 million self-monitoring glucose =
test strips=20
are used each day in the United States, users reported very few problems =
directly to FDA.
color=3D#000000=20
size=3D2>Most (53%) of the voluntary reports on glucose meters came from =
patients.=20
By comparison, only 17% of reports on all IVD products came from =
patients.=20
Others who submitted re-ports on glucose meters included patient family =
members,=20
pharmacists, other healthcare providers, and (in one case) an=20
attorney.
color=3D#000000=20
size=3D2>Among the voluntary reports, the most commonly reported glucose =
meter=20
problems were false high values (n =3D 17), false low values (n =3D 15), =
and erratic=20
values (n =3D 11). In addition, reports identified a number of unique =
issues:=20
color=3D#000000=20
size=3D2>*Six users reported they had inadvertently purchased meter =
strips labeled=20
not for use in the United States. These strips often exhibited =
differences in=20
calibration, labeling, and expiration dating. Users should be advised to =
check=20
their glucose strip labeling and promptly return any inappropriately =
imported=20
strips.
color=3D#000000 size=3D2>=95=20
Two users did not know the two ways to calibrate glucose meters to =
measure=20
finger stick glucose are to match finger stick glucose results with: (1) =
glucose=20
results in whole blood and (2) glucose results in plasma. Both ways =
produce=20
clinically valuable results; however, the results differ in that plasma =
results=20
are 10=9612% higher than whole blood results. Users should carefully =
read all=20
labels and instructions for use for their meter and their glucose test =
strips to=20
determine how their meter is calibrated, and to understand how =
calibration=20
affects their treatment decisions.
color=3D#000000 size=3D2>=95=20
Some users expressed surprise that FDA does not have performance =
requirements=20
for glucose meters. The Medical Device Amendments of 1976 require new =
tests to=20
be as accurate as old tests. The Diabetes Control and Complications =
Trial=20
unequivocally indicated home glucose measurements are=20
valuable.
color=3D#000000 size=3D2>*=20
Data suggest the current generation of glucose meters performs better =
than those=20
used in that study. An absolute measure of accuracy for glucose has not =
been=20
defined. Because no universally recognized glucose reference method =
exists, it=20
is difficult to compare the performance of glucose meters. =
color=3D#000000=20
size=3D2>Recently, FDA worked with scientists across the globe to =
develop a new=20
standard for glucose meters that sets a target of 20% total error and =
requires=20
labeling to help communicate meter performance.
color=3D#000000 size=3D2>=95=20
Some reports indicated users did not know how to check glucose meter=20
performance. Users should know they can compare their meter results with =
the=20
result of a laboratory test ordered by their =
physician.
color=3D#000000=20
size=3D2>Additionally, users should know that manufacturers of glucose =
meters will=20
provide them:
color=3D#000000 size=3D2>=95=20
technical support =95 quality control materials they can use to check =
or=20
monitor meter performance =95 replacement strips, meters, and =
calibration check=20
materials
color=3D#000000=20
size=3D2>MedWatch is the FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event =
Reporting=20
Program, is FDA's established mechanism for healthcare professionals and =
others=20
to voluntarily report problems suspected to be associated with drugs and =
medical=20
devices they prescribe, dispense, or use. MedWatch also provides =
information=20
about safety issues involving medical products, including prescription =
and=20
over-the-counter drugs, biologics, medical and radiation-emitting =
devices, and=20
special nutritional products. Medical product safety alerts, recalls,=20
withdrawals, and important labeling changes are disseminated to the =
medical=20
community and the general public on the MedWatch web site at:=20
http://w-vvw.fda.gov/medwatch/index.htiid. FDA encourages those who =
use=20
glucose meters to report problems to MedWatch. Reports can be submitted =
as=20
follows:
color=3D#000000=20
size=3D2>Fax to 1-800-FDA-0178, Phone to 1-800-FDA-1088, submit online =
at:=20
www.fda.gov/medwatch or mail to MedWatch, FDA, HF-2, 5600 Fishers Lane,=20
Rockville, MD 20852-9787
color=3D#000000=20
size=3D2>REFERENCES 1. The U.S. blood glucose strips =
market:=20
diabetes glucose self-monitoring test strips market: annual utilization =
of test=20
strips 2002. Dialog File Number 767. Accession Number 1022839. London: =
Frost and=20
Sullivan. Available from: http://www.dialogselect.com/business/ =
cgi/present.=20
Accessed 09 June 2003. 2. Weitgasser R, Gappmayer B, Pichler M: Newer =
portable glucose meters=97analytical improvement compared with previous =
generation=20
devices? Clin Chem 1999;45:1821-1825. 3. International =
Standardization=20
Organization: ISO/FDIS 15197:2003(E). Requirements for In Vitro Blood =
Glucose=20
Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing in Managing Diabetes Mellitus. U.S.=20
Technical Advisory Group for ISO/TC212. Administered by NCCLS. Wayne, =
PA: Global=20
Consensus =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =
------=_NextPart_000_00A2_01C52233.4192E6B0--
Related
Discussion:
low oxylate v low carb WOE (7 posts)
by Raleighgirl - Last post on: 09-07-05 10:52
Good morning all.
OUCH. KIDNEY STONES! Guess what I found out? Many of the
wonderful low-carb foods I've been eating in order to
(successfully) control Type II diabetes have caused me to develop
kidney stones. O man! I was diagnosed 5/05 and have just
recently started feeling like I'm "get... (Read More)
Re: Pseudo hypoglycemia (1 posts)
by EZGoinDm - Last post on: 08-31-03 22:00
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 22:56:00 +1200, "Elvin66"
wrote:
Thanks, so far I guess I've been lucky... The LOWEST reading I've had
since this whole thing started was 85.
>Yes, this is normal, I can only tell you this by being a 30 year diabetic
>who only about ten years ago decided it was best to... (Read More)
Perhaps one could use an iron chelator (1 posts)
by doe - Last post on: 11-24-04 02:16
http://tinyurl.com/4lajw
Who loves ya.
Tom
Jesus Was A Vegetarian! http://jesuswasavegetarian.7h.com
Man Is A Herbivore! http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/manisaherbivore
DEAD PEOPLE WALKING http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/deadpeoplewalking
... (Read More)
fish oil to replace your VIOXX? (3 posts)
by fresh~horses - Last post on: 10-25-04 00:51
Sujet: Re: cod liver oil replaces VIOXX?
De: sbharris@ix.netcom.com (Steve Harris sbharris@ROMAN9.netcom.com)
Groupes: sci.med,sci.med.pharmacy,misc.health.alternative
Organisation: http://groups.google.com
Date: 23. Oct 2004, 19:16:44
References: 1
fresh~horses@despammed.com wrote... (Read More)
Top
Discussions From Our Archives
[Fwd: Best price for pain medication?]
Medicare policy claim denials
Re: book
Obesity related to diabetes, hypertension & sleep apnea: Brody Study
Oxidation / rust / osteoarthritis / rheumatoid arthritis
Other
Discussion Categories
Diabetes Symptoms
Health Care Policy
Health Care Providers HMO
|
|